Magnit | July 31 2023
Managing workforces is getting more and more complex, especially as more companies are relying on remote and international workers to help optimize their talent supply chain. Depending on the type and size of the business, companies may partner with a Professional Employer Organization (PEO) or an Employer of Record (EOR) to help manage HR functions and remain compliant with local employment laws and regulations. But how can organizations determine which is better for the needs of their business?
In this blog post, we’re going to cover:
1. The difference between an EOR and PEO
2. The advantages of using a PEO
3. The disadvantages of using a PEO
4. The advantages of using an EOR
5. The disadvantages of using an EOR
6. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
A Professional Employer Organization (PEO) is a third-party service provider that offers human resources (HR) solutions to businesses. PEOs are typically responsible for managing essential HR functions, which include payroll management, employee benefits administration, workers’ compensation and some compliance services to ensure companies abide by employment laws. Through their co-employment arrangements, PEOs assume certain responsibilities on behalf of the businesses they work with, allowing companies to focus more on other operations while the PEO handles their HR needs.
An Employer of Record (EOR) is an organization that handles the responsibility of managing and administering payroll, risk management, and benefits for the employees at a company on the businesses’ behalf. Working with an EOR enables organizations to outsource payroll processing, risk mitigation tasks, and benefits administration. The EOR also assumes the crucial task of making sure local labor laws are followed, abiding by laws, staying up to date on the most recent legal requirements and changes, administering employee benefits and compensation, and putting preventative measures in place to reduce compliance risk. EORs deliver compliance guidance holistically across multiple categories of labor that are ongoing, versus being specifically focused on engagement (or hire) by engagement basis. EORs are essentially the experts in compliance at regional and local levels, guiding their customers to the best scalable solutions in related regions and beyond.
With a co-employment engagement through a PEO, the PEO and business still split certain responsibilities. An EOR, on the other hand, handles all the employer responsibilities on behalf of the organization.
Businesses can gain a lot of benefits by working with a PEO. These include having access to specialized HR knowledge and obtaining employee perks and insurance at affordable costs. By utilizing the PEO's expertise and experience, businesses can minimize administrative procedures and concentrate on their main business operations. Depending on the PEO, it can help guarantee that employment laws are followed, lowering legal risks and offering assistance when navigating complex legislation.
Additionally, PEOs offer employee benefit packages and provide scalability and flexibility, assisting firms in adjusting to fluctuating worker needs. Lastly, PEOs help to reduce the risks related to liability insurance, workers' compensation, and employment practices.
Using a PEO brings businesses advantages, but potential disadvantages should be considered. These include a loss of control over HR functions, limited customization options, dependency on a third-party provider, additional costs, potential communication challenges, and limited control over decision-making.
Co-employment arrangements may also cause confusion among employees regarding roles and responsibilities. Furthermore, there is a possibility of disruption if the provider is unable to meet expectations or faces financial instability. And because PEOs don’t assume all compliance risks, they can limit a company’s ability to efficiently expand into new locations.
If the pricing model of the PEO is based on the percentage of monthly payroll spend, costs may rise as more payroll spend gets added. Depending on the provider, extra percentages can incur if payroll grows by a specific variable in one month as well. Customers also get less input on benefit plans and schemes, which may include additional costs.
When selecting a PEO, it is crucial to carefully evaluate it and weigh the benefits against these potential drawbacks and ensure alignment with the company's needs and HR management requirements.
Working with a leading-edge EOR provides organizations with numerous benefits, including:
Using an Employer of Record (EOR) can come with some potential challenges. Depending on the provider, it could be more costly in the short-term compared to handling employment tasks in-house. Outsourcing employment responsibilities also means losing some control over the workforce, which could create obstacles.
In addition, cultural mismatches may arise if the EOR operates in a different country or region, which could potentially impact employee communications or create challenges when working with an EOR in a different time zone. That is why it is essential for organizations to carefully research and discuss any questions and concerns with the EOR they are considering to ensure it is the best fit.
Disclaimer: The content in this blog post is for informational purposes only and cannot be construed as specific legal advice or as a substitute for legal advice. The blog post reflects the opinion of Magnit and is not to be construed as legal solutions and positions. Contact an attorney for specific advice and guidance for specific issues or questions.